Difference between revisions of "Deep analysis with mind maps"

From WikIT
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>WikITSysop
imported>WikITSysop
Line 1: Line 1:
 
In the field and on the Web, mind maps made for business projects can generally be seen to follow the style referred to in WikIT as [[Mind maps#Common mind maps|common mind maps]].  For reasons described in [[Concept maps or mind maps? the choice#Common mind maps or Buzan mind maps?|Common mind maps or Buzan mind maps?]], using ''phrases'' for nodes in ''business mind maps'' generally turns out to be far more practical than adopting the [[Buzan guidelines simply stated|"one keyword" guideline (no.6)]].
 
In the field and on the Web, mind maps made for business projects can generally be seen to follow the style referred to in WikIT as [[Mind maps#Common mind maps|common mind maps]].  For reasons described in [[Concept maps or mind maps? the choice#Common mind maps or Buzan mind maps?|Common mind maps or Buzan mind maps?]], using ''phrases'' for nodes in ''business mind maps'' generally turns out to be far more practical than adopting the [[Buzan guidelines simply stated|"one keyword" guideline (no.6)]].
  
But there are at least two activities where even business mappers can benefit from adopting that approach.  When engaged in deep analysis of a subject, or when engaged in creative, "blue skies" thinking, Tony Buzan's guideline that mind maps should show one keyword per line is a game-changer.
+
But there are at least two activities where even business mappers can benefit from adopting that approach.  When engaged in deep analysis of a subject, or when engaged in creative, "blue skies" thinking, Tony Buzan's guideline that mind maps should show one keyword per line is a game-changer when compared with phrases in boxes or bubbles.
  
 
{{stub}}
 
{{stub}}

Revision as of 07:18, 15 December 2008

In the field and on the Web, mind maps made for business projects can generally be seen to follow the style referred to in WikIT as common mind maps. For reasons described in Common mind maps or Buzan mind maps?, using phrases for nodes in business mind maps generally turns out to be far more practical than adopting the “one keyword” guideline (no.6).

But there are at least two activities where even business mappers can benefit from adopting that approach. When engaged in deep analysis of a subject, or when engaged in creative, “blue skies” thinking, Tony Buzan’s guideline that mind maps should show one keyword per line is a game-changer when compared with phrases in boxes or bubbles.